You are here
Home ›U.S. Group Wants No New N-Plants, End to Relicensing
by Associated Press
A consumer and environmental advocacy group urged the Obama administration to freeze construction of new nuclear reactors and halt re-licensing of the oldest of the nation's 104 plants until safety lessons from the Japanese nuclear crisis can be absorbed.
The U.S. Public Interest Research Group issued a report Tuesday citing a history of safety problems at nuclear reactors in the United States.
It cited problems stretching back two decades at nuclear plants in Ohio, North Carolina, South Carolina, Kansas, New York, New Jersey and Vermont, including four considered "significant precursors" to damage to the reactor's core. There have been four such incidents in the U.S. since 1990, and 17 since 1979.
"Nuclear power is a high-stakes gamble that threatens public safety," the group wrote. Comparing nuclear reactors and slot machines, the report said the odds of getting one "7" on any slots play are fairly good, the chances of getting two are smaller, and the odds of getting three are slim, even though it happens from time to time.
"Nuclear power plants are like Vegas slot machines — but with costly and damaging accidents, rather than big payouts, the uncommon yet inevitable result," the report read. "This report reviews a series of incidents over the past 20 years at U.S. nuclear reactors in which one or even two unlucky 7s fell into place.
"In each of these cases, Americans were spared the kind of nuclear disaster on our soil that has contaminated food and drinking water, threatened the health of workers, and sparked widespread and disruptive evacuations in Japan," the report read. "But each of them represented a window of opportunity that might, under different circumstances, have led to disaster."
It claims U.S. plants are not immune to natural disasters, human error or other dangers that could cause a catastrophe similar to the one unfolding at Japan's tsunami-damaged Fukushima Daiichi power plant.
Neil Sheehan, a spokesman for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, said the report "is essentially a compendium of already reported and widely known issues with which the NRC is quite familiar."
He said the agency required a series of safety improvements at U.S. nuclear power plants in the 1980s and 1990s, plus additional upgrades after the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks.
Earlier this month, just after the Japanese crisis erupted, the NRC decided to conduct short- and long-term safety reviews of all U.S. nuclear plants "to check on whether the Japanese reactor events hold any implications for them," he said.
...
